So what is important to me as an amateur genealogist? As I have researched my own family history and researched genealogy as a discipline over the past few years, I have developed some strategies I use as I go about building my tree.
- Look for reliable sources and document them. This is something that has become very important to me. The Internet and companies like Ancestry.com have done wonders for genealogy by making so much information readily available to so many, but it has a downside... There is a lot of dubious information out there that has been accepted as fact although there is no real supporting evidence for it. As much as I like Ancestry, they are a chief enabler of this problem with their feature allowing you to cite someone else's tree as a source. This has lead to a rapid proliferation of theories, hunches, and just plain bad data as fact. I love using other people's research for leads and clues, but I insist on getting a reliable source before I put something permanently into my tree. I don't have my own copy of Evidence Explained yet, but I am following its principles for citing sources as much as possible. I also love seeing original documents. Where I can, I will seek out original copies rather than transcriptions. Seeing the real thing makes a connection that brings you that much closer to the people involved and helps me to know their stories. UPDATE: Thomas MacEntee' Genealogy Do-Over blog just had a great post about evaluating evidence and citing sources. On his corresponding Facebook page he posted a handy reference document of source citation templates. I have shared a copy here in my Google Drive.
- Look for context. The people you find when researching your family tree become so much more interesting when you can relate to them. The way we can relate to our ancestors is by knowing the history of the time and place where they lived. Through genealogy I've unexpectedly become a bit of a history buff and will dig through the Internet and my local library to find out as much as I can about the history that surrounded my ancestors' lives. Historical context is an important ingredient to really knowing their stories. This also means that when I'm looking at something like a census record, I'm not just looking at the entries for the people in my tree. I'm looking around them on the same page and on nearby pages to understand what the neighborhood was like. What kind of jobs did people have? Where were they born? How big we're the families? Were kids nearby in schools or working? This kind of poking around on records can also give you some surprising clues with your own family research.
- Look for patterns. As I do my research, I am always on the lookout for patterns. Most frequently, it's migration patterns I'm watching for, as these often help fill in details in the family story. For example, I had a number of Dutch ancestors in New Netherlands leave the area around Albany and start a settlement at what is now Kingston, New York. A few generations later, their descendants can be found near Port Jervis, NY along with descendents of many others who interacted with my family near Kingston. A few generations later, the same can be found in Virginia... What was it that caused these people to move together? What other clues can I uncover by digging into what is driving these patterns? I've got a lot of digging left to do on this, but these kinds of patterns are very interesting to me.
- Look for direct ancestors first. This is really more of an approach than a principle - I am focusing first on following my direct ancestors back the original immigrants to the United States. My goal is first to get back to the ends of those direct branches, then I will focus going further back with international records, and going sideways to fill in more aunts, uncles, and cousins. I will pursue some of these "sideways" branches from time to time, especially when I hit a wall, because those paths can help you find more detail on common ancestors, but it's not my priority for now.
Caught your post on Vita Brevis, and followed your link. Good plan. Similar to mine. I too have been exploring the history, geography, demography, etc, of areas I know my ancestors lived in. My strategy was first to lay out a "framework" around my grandparents and great-grandparents, locating them in time and space as far as I solidly could. Then filling in. But the big difference is that I am including as much collateral research as I can at the same time. As you say, those folks are often the context that leads to breakthroughs or validates which direction I need to go in. I'd say more than often for me: many of the names of my ancestors are common in general or repeated in different lines though generations. I've busted up several "lineages" done by others who didn't doublecheck the context or correctly document (some actually only referred to names in indexes!). It was only using those collateral lines and their connections that led me in the right direction. And you are so right: original sources where available and corroborative citations are essential.
ReplyDeleteGood blog. You are a thoughtful researcher and a good writer. I hope you keep it up. I relate: I thought all I was going to do was dig up the needed citations for the work done earlier by relatives. Ha. Now I am buried deep and loving it. I love history, and I think only by seeing history in terms of the people who lived it can we begin to grasp it.
Thanks a lot, Annie! I don't know how consistent I will be posting here, but I really appreciate your feedback. Good luck with your own research!
ReplyDelete